The “Quayle” Factor

I am laughing out loud right now.  I was just talking to a co-worker of mine.  We were reminiscing about Dan Quayle.  Seriously, what an idiot.  I remember every night, it seemed, the late night talk show hosts would have more material about Dan Quayle than anything else.  He just won’t stop.

Do you remember?  Seriously, America should have seen it coming.  I mean it all started with him screwing up the lines of his own swearing in.  And then (just the highlights I can remember, in no particular order), he made a racist comment about Indians in a Dunkin Donuts.  At a rally he told a paraplegic supporter to stand up.  Who can forget the time he dropped the F-bomb at one of the president’s most important bill signings.  He talked about the time President Roosevelt “took to the television airwaves” after the stock market crashed in 1929, even though Roosevelt was the governor of New York at the time, and television wasn’t invented yet.  He plagiarized an entire speech from a British labor party leader.  I remember the late night talk show hosts went wild when he claimed to have finished top of his class in law school, when he actually graduated #76 out of 85.  AND WHO could forget when he said, “the number-one job facing the middle class…happens to be…a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S, jobs”.  Oh yeah…Good times, good times.

Oh wait!!  I’m sorry.  My bad.  Quayle didn’t do any of those things.  Silly me.  Isn’t my face red?  He misspelled “potato.”  Our current Vice President Joe Biden did everything I listed above.  Sorry about that.  WOW…how did THAT happen?

Hmmm….it kinda makes you wonder, why is it that Quayle is remembered as an idiot/embarrassment to the country, but Biden is touted as a genius and a lovable character?  How is it my co-worker remembers Quayle as an idiot?  When asked why, she replied, “He can’t even spell ‘potato’.”  She didn’t know one thing about Biden.

Wait a minute!!!  Is there a double standard?

When I saw this article: Don’t worry, Joe: It ain’t so. Why Obama won’t run with Hillary Clinton  I was relieved.  We should definitely keep him around.  He is like Teflon.

Yeah, the more I think about it, I would say Biden is a pretty good running mate.  As long as you don’t mind his constant requests to tell him about the rabbits.

 

There are three kinds of websites: Too big, too small, and LIFEZILLA.

Viva la Idiots!

Viva la Idiots!

 What’s funny, (not funny ha-ha) is I wasn’t planning on writing about this at all.  It really isn’t my compétence, as the French would say, or “expertise” as I would say (not that I really HAVE expertise at all – other than, what has to be, the worlds biggest collection of stolen pens and post-it notes).  So, I’m watching Disney’s “Ratatouille” the other night with my nephews when one of the characters says one of my favorite lines in any movie…EVER.  The line: “I hate to be rude, but we’re French!”  Now to be fair, I have never been to France, (wait a minute, how is that “fair” I wanna go to France).  But I have met people from France and personally know several French Canadians.  I don’t know if it is the pouty-lipped-pansy-language or what, but they’re a unique group of people.

So, I’m watching the movie and I thought to myself, “The French (…eyeroll…)!  If there is a country that couldn’t recognize a correct political decision, even if it fell out of the sky, landed on their face and wiggled, it would be France.”

Why would I say that?  Well, recently the French (…eye roll…) had an election.  And although ousted President Nicholas Sarkozy is an idiot, he isn’t HALF as bad as the new President, François Hollande.

What makes Monsieur Hollande so bad?  Well, he is a hardcore leftist Socialist, whose economic policy plans, according to the Wall Street Journal “have roots in a punitive populism that would make U.S. Congressional class warriors blush.”

His pledge: to tax those who earn €1 million ($1.35 million) a year at a rate of 75%.

SACRE BLEU!!!  75%.  SEVENTY-FIVE PERCENT!!!

Those earning €150,000 a year will be taxed at a mere 45%.  I’m no mathematician but 45% is ALMOST HALF.

I’m not an economist either, but I’m pretty confident the seriously dire economic situation in France will only be helped as those who are earning enough Euro will not leave the country in drones, but will stay and pay, and create new jobs (la sarcasm).

Viva la Idiots! 

We have recently seen something similar in our country.  Recently Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin renounced his U.S. citizenship.  He did it before an initial public offering that values the social network at as much as $96 billion.  In other words, he just made a TON of money, but he won’t be on the hook for nearly the tax amount, as he would if he were a US citizen.  Saverin’s move could save him $67 million in federal taxes, according to data compiled by Bloomberg

According to Bloomberg, “Renouncing citizenship is an option chosen by increasing numbers of Americans. A record 1,780 gave up their U.S. passports last year compared with 235 in 2008, according to government records.”  It continues, “Income-tax rates for top U.S. earners will rise to 39.6 percent from 35 percent next year, and rates on capital gains and dividends also are scheduled to rise unless Congress blocks the increases.”

Back to the French (…eye roll…).  When Sarkozy questioned Hollande (we shall call him “La Douche” from now on) about his tax proposals he said, “It’s a message of social cohesion…It’s a matter of patriotism.”  HEY!!!!  That sounds familiar. That’s kinda the same thing Obama said (although I imagine it sounds sexier in French).  English or French is boils down to a whole bunch of “merde.”  As fun as it sounds, you can’t punish the job creators.  Well, I guess you can, that and you can regulate them to death.  It just hurts everyone.

The thing is, you can make the rich the butt end of your class-warmongering, redistributionary, tax-hiking rhetoric all day long.  But don’t be surprised when they pack up and leave.  And guess what?  They’ll take their wealth with ’em.  It’s sad, and a damn shame for American opportunity and economic growth.

If I, with my liiiiiiiiiittle tiny right leaning brain, can see that why can’t the rest of the world?

Vive la Capitalism!

Additional reading

Quotes regarding the French:

“France has neither winter nor summer nor morals. Apart from these drawbacks it is a fine country. France has usually been governed by prostitutes.” —Mark Twain

“I would rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind me.” —General George S. Patton

“Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion.” —Norman Schwartzkopf

“We can stand here like the French, or we can do something about it.” —Marge Simpson

An old saying: Raise your right hand if you like the French…. Raise both hands if you are French.

LIFEZILLA:  With a name like Lifezilla it’s gotta be good.

My first venture into blogging….

Before I launch into this I have to tell you, I HATE the word “Blog.”  I don’t really know why, I just always have.

A few months ago I wrote about the death of  Andrew Breitbart and the influence his book had on my life.  His book inspired me, so I started writing, occasionally, for a non-profit organization called United Families International.  To test me out they asked me to write about a recent conference of Pedophiles.  I was a little weirded out on the topic.  Before this “assignment” the only thought I had given to pedophiles (other than being grossed out) was thinking that 20 mph in a school zone seemed the optimal speed for someone checking out kids.  I then read a couple of articles and looked at a few websites.  And let me tell you, there is not enough hand sanitizer in the world to help you feel clean after reading what these people have to say.

So, I wrote the following…

Normalizing Pedophilia

Several years ago I was driving home and passed a neighborhood I pass every day.  It is backed away about 75 yards, semi-secluded, from a very busy street.  I was rounding the corner on this busy street and saw a child, no more than three years old, on a corner.  There wasn’t a parent in sight.  I quickly went through the options in my mind.  Do I keep driving and hope the kid doesn’t get struck or abducted, do I stop, put the kid in my car, or walk with the child and try to find his home?

Being a man, and a father, I immediately knew I wasn’t going to allow the child to come near my car.  I also knew I wouldn’t be thrilled if I saw someone I didn’t know walking up my street with my child.  So I figured I would tell the kid to go home.  I pulled over, rolled down the passenger side window, and kindly said, “You need to go home”.  The kid looked up at me, with snot running down his binky.  “Go home”, I said again, “You need to go home”.  I received a blank stare.  “Your Mom wants you to go home.  Go home”.  Nothing.  So I switched tactics.  I furrowed my brow and yelled, “GO HOME RIGHT NOW!!!”  The child let out a wail, turned around and went crying home.

So, I hear you asking, what’s your point?

Earlier this month (August 17, 2011) there was a Baltimore conference aiming to “normalize” pedophilia.  Oh, you read correctly.  A conference to “normalize” pedophilia – a conference!  That means more than just Pervy McPervertson  and his cousin Sicky McSickyson were in attendance.  I’m talking a group of some of the “best and brightest” researchers from several prominent U.S. universities were there as well.  What was the goal of this conference? Well, according to the sponsoring organization’s (B4U-ACT) website they want to discuss ways to revise of the American Psychological Association (APA) classification of pedophilia.

Why?

How it works is these groups of pedophiles (it makes me wonder how they initially meet) sponsor meetings with members of the APA, to persuade them to redefine or remove “several long-recognized categories of mental illness” from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

According to Linda Ames Nicolosi, publications director of the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH):

 “Normalizing” pedophilia would have enormous implications, especially since civil laws closely follow the scientific community on social-moral matters”, she continued, “If pedophilia is deemed normal by psychiatrists, then how it can remain illegal?  It will be a tough fight to prove in the courts that it should still be against the law.”

 Sadly this kind of advocacy isn’t new.  Years ago similar groups tried to “normalize” pedophilia by calling it “intergenerational sex”, arguing there was nothing wrong with it as long as the adult involved with the child/children was not an “authority figure”.

I KNOW!!!  The first time I heard that I rolled my eyes so hard I fell out of my chair!

And thus, the point of my story.  EVERY child considers an adult an “Authority Figure”.  I barely flexed my “authority figure” muscle and scared a child into running home.  Any adult can scare or manipulate children.  We need to make sure parents are aware of this agenda and take steps to make sure their plans don’t get a foot hold.

To listen to an interview with Matt Barber, Vice President of Liberty Counsel Action, who was in attendance at the B4U-ACT conference of pedophiles, go here.

LIFEZILLA: Where the “Hokey Pokey” really IS what it’s all about.

 

This just isn’t right….

 

I know, I know.  I haven’t posted anything all week.  AND SO MUCH HAS HAPPENED TOO!!!!  I have a TON of stuff I want to vent about.  I just have had so much time and so little to do.  Strike that, reverse it, thank you.

So in the interest of posting ANYTHING I want to share a picture I took several months ago.

So, I’m outside of Winco (a supermarket)  when I see this parking place. Sooo…Not only do the handicap people get the best parking spots, now they get free lap dances too? GASP!!! Is it just me, or is there something completely NOT FAIR about that?

 

Lifezilla: Five out of four blondes prefer Lifezilla over other websites.

I JUST FIGURED OUT…..

OHMIGOSH!!!!  I just figured out where the Obama re-election committee came up with the new slogan “Forward.”

Its the Simpson’s episode where aliens take over the Presidential race as Bob Dole and Bill Clinton!!

Seriously. Watch it for yourself.

 

http://youtu.be/uLR3CgeUeyc

 

LIFEZILLA:  Filling the internet with little cleansing bubbles

 

Obama’s new campaign slogan….

President Obama announced his new campaign slogan is “Forward”.  That would be awesome if we weren’t standing on the edge of a cliff.

 

A friend sent this to me……

Paradigm shifts Shemaradigm shifts

Paradigm shifts Shemaradigm shifts

I have a friend who spends most of his time in “Sin City” pinching flesh (mostly other peoples.)  He is a professional massage therapist in Las Vegas, who, although he is not a subscriber to my website (he should be – AND SO SHOULD YOU) he replied to my most recent and BRILLIANTLY written article “Stand Like a Rock.”  My original thought was to quickly reply to it, but I was a little long winded.  I decided instead to post my reply.  (Disclaimer: I wrote this really fast so I’m SURE there are going to be typos.  Please forgive me.)

These are his comments to my article.  Below is my reply:

Uh-hum…What about paradigm shift(s)? Ie: Polygamy is the only way to the Celestial kingdom of Heaven… wait a minute… now we condemn & shun those who continue to practice it. (Talk about compromise: 1847 statehood for Utah became more important than standing firm in one’s own Celestial matrimony beliefs & practices instructed by a Prophet of God.) By the way, It’s interesting that you brought up Thomas Jefferson. Oxymoron anyone? His party affiliation @ the time was known as DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLICAN. He too also stood “FIRM” in his beliefs… own lots & lots of slaves (hundreds) & fathered a few with the house help of Miss Sally Heming.

Paradigm shifts Shemaradigm shifts.  Polygamy Shemolygamy.  Who cares?  Seriously, we are talking about something that happened a hundred and twenty years ago.  Let it rest.  Why did the Lord have polygamy at the time?  I dunno. Could it have been the fact that there were a large number of widows and families with single parents?  (Due to persecutions, mob violence, and war, many children lost their fathers or mothers.)  Could it be that, more than anything, this practice was to support these families giving food, shelter, and parental love and teaching?  I dunno.  At the time, lo those many years ago, there were no national laws prohibiting polygamy. That didn’t stop people from driving the Mormons west.  When the Supreme Court ruled that later anti-polygamy laws were constitutional the Lord directed President Woodruff to issue the Manifesto (1890), and the practice ended in the Church.  In the Book of Mormon Jacob 2:27-30 states, “for there shall not any man among you have save it be one wife: and concubines he shall have none… for if I will, saith the Lord of Hosts, raise up seed unto me, I will command my people; otherwise they shall hearken unto these things.”  All throughout the scriptures there are times the Lord commands it and times he takes the practice away.  When President Gordon B. Hinckley was interviewed by Larry King he said only a small percentage of Mormons practiced polygamy in the late 1800’s.  He put the number between 2-5%.  Just for fun let’s say he was WAAAAAAAAAAY off and the number was 20%.  According to this website there were only 250,000 Mormons in the 1890’s.  So if we take President Hinckley’s high and my “lets just say” high we are talking between 12,500 – 50,000 people practicing polygamy, a HUNDRED AND TWENTY YEARS AGO.    Does it matter to me, here, now?  No.  So, again, who cares? Oh, but “now we condemn & shun those who continue to practice it.”  No kidding.  The only freaks that are practicing it now, that make the news, are the guys who are raping 13 year old girls.  They should be condemned and shunned.

As for Jefferson, he did own slaves.  Lots of them.  How is it shocking to anyone that in the 1700’s (over two hundred years ago) someone who was raised owning slaves, owed slaves?

I’m not justifying bad behavior with bad behavior.  But just to illustrate, I have several quotes from George Bernard Shaw that I love.  He said some really cool things.  A few years ago I found out the guy was a total freak.  He believed in and pushed for eugenics.  He defended Hitler and mass killings.  He PUSHED for it.

Jefferson was a brilliant, BRILLIANT man, who did a great work.  Does the fact he owned slaves put a blemish on him?  Yes.  Does it distract from the fact he was a brilliant man who did a great work?  No.  He was a man, prone to make mistakes like the rest of us.

In the 1780s Jefferson supported a bill to prohibit his state (Virginia) from importing slaves. In the 1784 Congress, Jefferson proposed federal legislation banning slavery in the New Territories of the Northwest (it didn’t pass.)  In 1807, as President, he signed a bill prohibiting the US from participating in the international slave trade.  There is no question he was an abolitionist.

Slavery is a horrible, horrible thing, but it was part of the gig back then.  In Virginia, at the time, it was illegal to free your slaves, even after your death.

As for Miss Sally Heming, there are many historians who question if Thomas Jefferson fathered children with her.  Yes, there was the story in 1998 about DNA proving Jefferson fathered children with Sally Hemmings, the fact that in 2001 a committee reviewed all the same data and concluded that Jefferson’s younger brother Randolph (1755-1815) was more likely the father of the children is an inconvenient footnote.  But JUUUUUUUUST for fun, let’s say Thomas Jefferson DID father those children.  Which aspect of the story offends you?  Is it the fact he had sex outside the bonds of marriage (he was a widower,) or the fact he had inter-racial sex?

 

Lifezilla.net:  We would never use flattery to get you to come to our site.  I mean when you have readers as good looking, talented and sexy as you are, why would we NEED to flatter you?

 

 

Stand Like a Rock

Stand Like a Rock

 I know, I know.  I’m not supposed to judge others.  But I do. Sue me.  I’m human (please don’t sue me).  I’m no lawyer, but I understand in law judgments are supposed to be concrete.  The law says you are not supposed to do “X” and if you did “X,” the punishment is “Y.”  Pretty easy concept.  Judging other peoples opinions is A LOT different –not concrete at all.  It’s more like Jell-o. To judge where people stand, it really depends on where you sit.  So it’s not even Jell-o, it’s a sliding scale.

An example:

I am a perfect driver.  I drive the EXACT speed that is necessary for any situation.  (This is, of course, contrary to the state law in which I reside, which would use the stack of speeding tickets I have incurred throughout the sojourn of my life, as an example of this falsehood).  Anyone who drives slower than me is stupid, and anyone who drives faster is an idiot.  Please permit me to tell a short side story.  Years ago I was driving with my son, who was about 3 at the time.  We were getting on the freeway when a guy, in a louder car, sped past us.  I heard this sweet little voice in the backseat say, “what a jackass.”  I asked him why he said that.  His reply, “he passed us”.  I learned a valuable lesson about “little ears” that day.

So, I hear you ask, what’s my point?

This election year I have heard a lot of labels being tossed around, where I honestly don’t know what they mean, but people accept them.  The four I hear most often are Liberal Democrat, Democrat, Moderate Republican/Conservative, and Republican.  Obviously I understand the words Democrat and Republican.  The one I find most intriguing and really don’t really understand is “Moderate Conservative.”  My question is, “Moderate according to whom?”  I’m a Right leaning guy.  Am I a Moderate?  Probably not.  I’m kind of critical of Moderates.  I’ll tell you why.

In my humble opinion, a Moderate is someone who has bought into the propaganda that you have the fundamental right to never be offended.   Well guess what Nancy?  You don’t have the right to never be offended.  I’ve been offended before and I’m right 91% of the time.

GUESS WHAT!?!?!?  My wife just told me I have sexdaily!  WOO-HOO!!!  After all these years of my begging and pleading we are finally going to…Excuse me, hold on.  What honey?  I have what?  Are you kidding me?!?! Oh crap.  Well, apparently I don’t have sexdaily, I have dyslexia.  So I’m only right 19% of the time.  That sucks TWICE for me.  That was a really lose/lose situation.  Pfffff…This is me now.  (._.)

Winston Churchill once said, “You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.”  Of course you don’t want to be a jerk.  But if you believe in something stand up for it.

“But Danny,” I hear you whine, “what about compromise?”

Ayn Rand once said, “In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit.” Another time she said, “The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that there can be no compromise on basic principles.”

So, can you be a “Statesman” and still be a conservative?  Of course you can.  Thomas Jefferson said, “In matters of style swim with the current.  In matters of principle stand like a rock.”

It doesn’t matter what they are.  Find five, or so, true principles you won’t budge on.  Then hold on to them.  People may disagree with you, but they will always respect you.

 

Remember: Lifezilla is the only website with a million dollar guarantee.  You give me a million dollars, I guarantee to write you anything you want!

 

Looking like a FOOL!!!

B4 i lunch in2 this i want u 2 understand i no i make typo’s ever so often.  i no.  Some X’s i get so exited to post what i have wrottened, I just throw it up (that sounded gross).  When I 1st thoughted to rite this I thoughted to say, hey, I don’t make typos.  I invent knew words, or new grammer rules.  But I desided to tell da troof.  Some tymes I hav my fryend Dave help me.  hes really smoort.  If I posted somethyin with out any mystakes its because Dave poof red it.

Quick story:

Today I went to the local convenience store for my first of several doses of caffeine. (Mmmmmm caffeine.)  As I’m getting out of my car I hear a woman screaming obscenities at someone.  The “F” word was FLYING.  I look over to see who was screaming at whom (or would it be “whom was screaming at who”?).  So I see a guy who, not only looks like a tool because he is being yelled at, he also has his pants down past his butt.  PAST HIS BUTT.  His black underwear glistening in the sun for all to see.  As I’m watching them, he waves one arm in the air in a dismissive gesture and starts walking away from the car.  His butt clenched tight, causing him to walk with his pelvis propelled forward, bull-legged, to keep his pants up.  All I could think was “What.  An.  Idiot.”.

Because I’m a guy, and I believe women are the main driving force behind every decision a man makes, I asked the women around the office if they thought that was an attractive look.  Now I work with a really diverse group of women.  Age, ethic group, styles.  They are all over the board.  Without exception they all thought it was a stupid look.  So why the hell do some guys do this?  It would be one thing if it was a short lived fad.  This has been going on for years!

It was January of 2010 the “Pants on the ground” guy sung on American Idol.  TWO YEARS AGO.

I’ve got to think it was about five years ago I saw this:

I get it  now………

SERIOUSLY!!!!!

How can anyone take this guy seriously?  Would you hire a guy who was dressed like that?

PEOPLE!!!!!

 

Get Confident, Stupid!!

 Get Confident, Stupid!!

  I gotta tell ya, I have recently come to the realization that the best time to start any project, preparation, plan, personal policy or kidnapping, is exactly five years ago. My brain is constantly being inundated with things I wish I would have written about.

It’s really annoying.

Imagine filtering through the mod podge/ collage of songs, silliness, movies, phrases, family, dumbery, full frontal nudity, political philosophy, the Wangdoodles, Hornswogglers, Snozzwangers, or the rotten, Vermicious Knids that are constantly bombarding my brain.  I have to sift myself through a buttload of groan-inducing and mediocre crap to find the one little gold nugget I want to write about.  I could easily compare it to mining for diamonds in a gigantic grotto filled with fossilized bat dung.  Because that is exactly what it’s like.

Again, it’s really annoying.

So I have been thinking about this off and on the last few years.  It is something that really bothers me.  I primarily see it in the media, but it extends into everyday life with normal people too.  I don’t know if I’m special (my mom says I am) or if my brain is just wired weird.  I just don’t have a problem with people having their own points of view.  In fact, I welcome it.

Let me explain.  About three years ago we had the introduction of “the tea party.”  A group of people who were sick of “business as usual” in Washington, who felt like we, as Americans, were Taxed Enough Already and wanted to rein in the out of control spending in Washington.  A very noble goal.  Of course, you had the few fringe weirdos who wore the colonial clothing complete with the three cornered hats.  I have no problem with those guys either.  When watching the news every once in a while you would see a sign that said something like, “I am John Galt”, or “Vote for John Galt.”  I had just recently finished reading Atlas Shrugged” by Ayn Rand so I knew exactly who John Galt was.  I also remember for a short time, the media trying to vilify Ayn Rand.  I was watching a reporter interviewing Congressman Paul Ryan.  The reporter asked Mr. Ryan if he agreed with Ayn Rand about something.  Mr. Ryan said he did.  The reporter then said (something along the lines of) “so you don’t believe in God?” (I’m doing this from memory – I tried for just a minute to find it on Youtube, but got bored.)  The reporter tried to draw the conclusion that because Ayn Rand was an atheist, and because Congressman Ryan agreed with a facet of her philosophy that suddenly Ms. Rand was elevated to godhood where everything that falls from her lips was and is the gospel truth.  If she didn’t believe in something, then clearly he didn’t believe it either.

That, my dear reader, is what bothers me.  It happens time and time again.

One more example, again, from a few years ago.  Shortly after a new group of Tea Party approved congressmen/women were elected, I was watching an interview with Speaker of the House John Boehner.  Between bouts of sobbing he was flippantly asked by the reporter (who looked like he would more likely be a member of the Saturday Night Live cast, than a reporter) something along the lines of why he (Boehner) couldn’t get House Republicans to “march in line.” (Again this is from memory – I’m sure it was worded better than that).  I don’t remember exactly what Boehner said, because four words into his pansy reply I started screaming at the TV.   (I’m really brave at home, in my room, with the door locked, under my bed, holding my blankie, with the lights on).  I know Boehner’s reply was pansy because he is holding out hope the media will one day realize Republicans are great people.  He should have said, “Do you even understand how our Government works?”  Then go on to explain that the beauty, and pure brilliance, of our system of government is that it was designed by men who knew the biggest danger to our freedom was the power of other men.  The founders designed a government of limited, enumerated powers, whose formation was intended to make the accumulation of power by a group (or by individuals) difficult and short lived.  Then, they brilliantly added a list of rights which were inviolable no matter who was in power.  In other words, you cute little reporting bugger you, the Republicans are not robots.  They don’t march.  Obviously there are certain principles you would like them to unite against (or for) but on everything else they need to vote their conscience.  If Boehner wanted to REALLY hit a home run, he could have continued and explained that our Founders insight into human nature explains why Marx’s “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” crap can never work.  Marx’s theory assumes people are able to be honest about their needs and abilities, when, in fact, most people overestimate both.

But Boehner blew it.

In business, if you have two people on a team who agree with each other 100% of the time, one of them isn’t necessary.  Wouldn’t the same be true in government?

So if I listen to Glenn Beck every once in a while it doesn’t mean I’m buying gold, stockpiling weapons, and burying food in the back yard, preparing for the post apocalyptic world (I would be buying gold if I had a pot to piss in.) I can enjoy his commentary and filter out what I don’t think has value all by myself. Thank you.

When I was in High School I used to watch Bill Maher on ABC’s Politically Incorrect.   I thought he was funny and insightful.  Now I think he’s an ass.  I disagree with almost everything that spews out of his pie hole.  But I believe he has a right to say what he wants.  And if you, or someone you know, thinks he is funny and insightful I don’t automatically think you’re an ass (although let’s be honest, you probably are.)

Granted, being part of a group makes it so that SOME of your goals, ideas, values, or principles are the same, be they be political, social, religious or intellectual.  The individual is the most important.  Groups can be swayed.  We are all capable and should practice individual thought, and should recognize, and respect this ability in others.